tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26741618.post1818618779844688983..comments2024-02-28T02:22:20.886-08:00Comments on homunculus: God, the universe, and selling booksPhilip Ballhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09986655706443117158noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26741618.post-36182426490914489502010-09-11T01:40:28.455-07:002010-09-11T01:40:28.455-07:00Re: type face issue
Edward is correct, you should...Re: type face issue<br /><br />Edward is correct, you should remove:<br /><br />style="font-family: Times; font-size: 12pt;<br /><br />from within the preceeding tag < > to the offending paragragh.Alex Rowbothamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08017355457095527809noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26741618.post-35571834189424184832010-09-10T08:10:33.403-07:002010-09-10T08:10:33.403-07:00re: typeface issues
Try: blogger.com > Edit Po...re: typeface issues<br /><br />Try: blogger.com > <b>Edit Posts</b> > select <b>Edit</b> "offending post" > select the <b>Edit Html</b> tab > ...<br /><br />In this view you should be able to see the html markup that's causing the font change. Likely something you inhereted when you cut and paste into the <b>Compose</b> mode.Edwardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04295927435118827266noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26741618.post-63811420173556553082010-09-10T05:43:06.151-07:002010-09-10T05:43:06.151-07:00From your experience as an author, do you think th...From your experience as an author, do you think that the publisher could be the prime motivation?<br /><br />If so, it doesn't paint a pretty picture, envisioning a Fagin like character, inducing the little Oliver Twisted to: "You got to pick apocryphal or two."<br /><br />As an 'old atheist', I'm growing deeply sceptical regarding the true motives behind the 'New Atheist' movement. I can't look at Dawkins any more, without seeing the Fabian Polly Toynbee peering over his halo.<br /><br />These 'New Atheists' rap themselves in the flag of science, yet contribute nothing to it. Their hobby doesn't need scientific authority if it is based on good reason, hence science gets nothing from the deal, yet risks political association with who ever is driving that campaign.<br /><br />You might ask yourself: why does 'science' need to challenge religion now, when real science was doing splendidly, thank you very much, for the last 200 years; whilst religion was busily sinking into private contemplation?<br /><br />As a games player, my instinct is roused; I smell Fabians, and Marxist-Feminists. And I see the rising of a state that will suffer no other gods before it; that so shames its own politicians, that the Leviathan of the state no longer needs to take orders from the etiolated parliamentary democracy; that it keeps alive as a half dead stalking horse, to dupe the 'free men' from thoughts of insurrection.<br /><br />Or maybe Jeremy Kyle can tell me what to think?JimmyGirohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01548795180321590463noreply@blogger.com